WORK PACKAGE 3

Identification of research and capacity gaps

Objectives

Work package 3 aims to both identify the potential for more variables relevant to the Polar Regions to be assimilated into models for simulations and forecasts, and also assess different satellite missions linked to a number of in-situ and airborne observational scenarios. In particular with regard to Copernicus expansion in terms of their benefit for environmental monitoring and with regard to integration/assimilation and the generation of modelling/forecast products.

1) Identify the potential for more variables relevant to the Polar Regions to be assimilated into models for simulations and forecasts.
Status to date: Complete. WP3 have completed a detailed review on current assimilated parameters is performed and identified the limitations. The potential of new variables that are relevant for assimilation into models for simulations and forecasts of conditions in the Polar Regions have been identified. Moreover, a concept for a move forward on data assimilation has been presented. Tasks 3.3 and 3.4 are the main contributors to this objective. For more information on the output of Task 3.3, please view the presentation below, presented at the EO4 Polar workshop.

KEPLER: Assessment on the Status and Improvements for Remote Sensing Polar Monitoring in Copernicus Program– presentation

2) Assess different satellite missions linked to a number of In situ and airborne observational scenarios (in particular with regard to Copernicus expansion) in terms of their benefit for environmental monitoring and with regard to integration/ assimilation and the generation of modelling/forecast products.
Status to date: Complete. WP3 have prepared a comprehensive review of the current status of remotely sensed parameters acquired over Polar Regions and compared them with the products provided by the Copernicus services to identify current data gaps. An assessment of future satellite missions (in particular the HPCMs) has been performed, and feasible synergies between parameters obtained from different satellite missions have been identified to enhance the information content considering the end-users requirements. All tasks of WP3 contribute to this objective.

Tasks

T3.1 In situ observing systems.Jeremy Wilkinson
T3.2 New and novel in-situ and
airborne observation sensors and techniques.
Nick Hughes
T3.3 Space-based capability.Carolina Gabarro
T3.4 Integration and assimilation through
Quantitative Network Design (QND).
Thomas Kaminski

Output

A review on the in situ observations status in Copernicus was performed in task 3.1, to provide suggestions on how to improve Copernicus’ use of in situ observations. This task is divided in two directions:

  1. Investigation on the role citizen science can play in the expansion of Copernicus’ in situ monitoring priorities.
  2. Assessing how the observational research community, both marine and terrestrial, can better contribute with in situ monitoring to the aims of Copernicus Services.

Work in task 3.2 evaluates the most recent developments in technologies such as, e. g., airborne hyperspectral imaging or tomographic radar, bio-optical sensors on autonomous platforms such as ITPs or at multi-sensor ship towed sledge systems. It also investigate whether these technologies are practical for use in an operational context to support Copernicus services either in providing ground truth or for providing an additional source of validation data, considering both the technological viewpoint and the operator longevity standpoint.

WP1 provided WP3 with feedback from the operational maritime community regarding their needs with respect to the current state of Copernicus services and research and satellite capabilities. They also provided recommendations on how the products could be improved to be prepared for changing conditions in the Arctic. WP2 and WP3 worked together with the identification of the parameters currently served by Copernicus, and also on the evaluation of the observational capacities of the HPCMs in terms of providing relevant products for the Arctic.

The recommendations of WP3 were distributed on time to WP5 to progress on the roadmap and all deliverables and milestones have been submitted. This WP is closed.

Deliverables

ReportPublication DateStatus
D3.1 In situ observation gapsAug
2020
D3.2 New and novel observation sensors and techniquesNov
2019
D3.3 Gaps in terms of space-based capabilitiesAug
2020
D3.4 Synthesis report on research and capacity gapsAug
2020

Meetings

Arctic Shipping Forum (Helsinki, Finland, April 2019): METNO, UKRI-BAS
• ESA Living Planet symposium (Milan, Italy 2019): METNO, ULUND, ICM-CSIC, ILab
• IICWG-XX (Copenhagen, Denmark 2019): METNO, ILab
• Arctic Frontiers (Tromsø, Jan 2020): ULUND
• 9th International Workshop on Sea Ice Modelling, Data Assimilation and Verification (Bremen,
2019): METNO, ILab, NERSC
IAHR 2020 (Japan, September 2020) *Postponed due to Covid-19*
• ESA/EC EO Polar workshop (Copenhagen, Oct 2020): ICM-CSIC, MetNo, ULUND, NERSC

WP3 Posts

WP3 Leader

Carolina Gabarro, ICM/CSIC

Institutes
Partners

Verónica González-Gambau ICM/CSIC

Jeremy Wilkinson, BAS

Penny Wagner, MET Norway 

Nick Hughes, MET Norway 

Marcin Pierechod, MET Norway 

Thomas Lavergne, MET Norway 

Lief Toudal-Pedersen, EOLAB

Gilles Garric, Mercator Ocean Intl. 

Steffen Tietsche, ECMWF

Michael Voßbeck, ILAB

Thomas Kaminski, ILAB

Margareta Johansson, LUND University

Marko Scholze, LUND University

Astrid Bracher, AWI

Wolfgang Dierking, AWI

Annette Samuelsen, NERSC

Laurent Bertino, NERSC

Eirik Malnes, NORCE

Rune Storvold, NORCE

Thomas Diehl, JRC

Frank Kauker, OASYS

Subscribe to the KEPLER mailing list

Get news delivered directly to your inbox.

%d bloggers like this: